|
“I’m Not In There”
by Brian J. Hennessy
"It is hard to escape the conclusion that today one of the greatest
roadblocks to the gospel of Jesus Christ is the institutional
church...(it) too often represents something radically different from
the Jesus Christ of the Bible."
- Howard A. Snyder, The Problem of Wineskins
"The church itself, because of its institutional focus, has become a
major hindrance to the fulfillment of Christ's scheme for effective
revelation of Himself in the world."
- Robert C. Girard, Brethren, Hang Together
"The church as it has been organized over the centuries, in many ways
has become organized into structures that are contrary to the plan of
God as expressed in the New Testament. And one thing is perfectly
clear: God does not bless that which militates against His purposes."
-Rev. Terry Fullam, Miracle in Darien by Bob Slosser
"Even though the leaders of the Protestant Reformation sincerely
intended to break with the traditional Roman Catholic conception of
the church, nevertheless, the tradition arising from the Reformation
did not succeed in making the break."
- Hendrick Hart, Will All the Kings Men
"The church is never a place, but always a people; never a fold but
always a flock; never a sacred building but always a believing
assembly. The church is you who pray, not where you pray. A structure
of brick or marble can no more be a church than your clothes of serge
or satin can be you."
- John F. Havlik, People-Centered Evangelism
"The church is found wherever the Holy Spirit has drawn together a few
persons who trust Christ for their salvation, worship God in spirit
and truth, and have no dealings with the flesh and devil."
- A.W. Tozer, The Best Of Tozer
Not long
after my wife and I had been spiritually awakened to the reality of
Jesus Christ in 1976, the Lord gave Mo (short for Maureen) a vision
that was as powerful as it was perplexing.
While making
the bed one morning, a "scene" suddenly appeared before her eyes. In
this vision she saw Jesus sitting on a hillside looking down into a
valley filled with steepled churches of all shapes and sizes. As she
stared at the scene she saw that Jesus was weeping. Then He slowly
turned to her and said, with tears in His eyes, "I'm not in there."
The sorrow in His voice was so deep it caused her to start crying
also. Then the scene faded.
Being new in the Lord we did not fully understand what
Jesus was saying to us. How could He not be in those places? Weren't
those Christian churches? At the time we ourselves were attending a
Spirit-filled Episcopal church, having recently left Roman
Catholicism, the denomination in which we were raised. It would take
several more years of trying unsuccessfully to settle down in
different expressions of the Protestant world before we would finally
understand what Jesus meant. Just as He declared - He wasn't to be
found in any of those buildings! Most of His people were in those
places. His Word was often in those places. And His Name was
repeatedly mentioned. But He was missing. Men and their traditions
were being served instead!
Later we found this truth confirmed to us in the Word of
God. For the Bible clearly states, "The Most High does not dwell in
houses (religious buildings) made with human hands; as the prophet
says: 'Heaven is My throne, and earth is the footstool of My feet,
what kind of house will you build for Me?'" (Acts 7:48,49). Although
He had allowed His people to build Him a temple under the first
covenant, it was never meant to be more than an interim step to a more
intimate place of worship, which was finally realized under the new
covenant. For Hebrews 9:8 declares, "The Holy Spirit is signifying
this, that the way into the holy place has not yet been disclosed,
while the outer tabernacle is still standing , which is a symbol for
the time then present...." Having served its purpose, God allowed that
Jewish temple to be removed in 70 AD to make way for the new and
greater revelation. As the Bible reveals, we are now the temple of
God. (1 Cor. 3:16; 6:19.) We are now the only place on earth where He
is officially present.
To set up again another "outer tabernacle," i.e. a
physical building on earth as a divine sanctuary, is to actually
nullify a major part of the finished work of Jesus on the cross.
(Which is why I'm certain that we will never see another stone temple
built in Jerusalem!) For by His death and resurrection, Jesus acquired
for us direct access into the true holy place in the spirit realm via
His Spirit who indwells us. Although we may think the church building
has been part of Christianity from the start, in fact there were no
such buildings constructed for the first 300 years.
Once we began to understand the enormity of this, we had
to ask ourselves: "If Jesus wasn't in those church buildings, why were
we?" We soon concluded we didn't need to be in there - and left. And
once you see clearly that the institutional church is not the Church
of Jesus Christ, you too can leave with a clear and joyful conscience
as well.
Two Churches
What we
eventually realized was that the ecclesia, the Body of Jesus Christ,
and the institutional church (Catholic or Protestant) are two
completely different entities. The true "church" of Jesus Christ is a
people called out of all generations and nations to be members of His
body. It is a living, breathing organism - not an organization - being
taught and discipled by the Holy Spirit in this age to "grow up in all
aspects into Him, who is the head, even Christ...." (Eph. 4:15). It's
membership includes only those whom the Father has called and placed
His Spirit and then given to Jesus as servant brothers and sisters
(see John 6:37). Although this "family" is always complete, it is also
always expanding to include those whom the Father has preordained to
be sons and daughters. Drawn from both Jews and Gentiles, these chosen
"descendants of Abraham" (Gal. 3:29) are destined to become a holy
nation that will one day be exalted in righteousness on planet earth
as the restored Israel of God.
The institutional church, on the other hand, is merely a
religious framework derived from pagan antiquity, which long ago, was
imposed on the body of Christ. It usually includes, in all its
expressions, an earthly sanctuary, a certain well-defined theology, a
professional clergy, a calendar of holy days and celebrations, and a
hierarchy of spiritual authority. Organized according to the pattern
of all other organizations in this world, it is run like a business
corporation. It was established first in the church of Rome and later
carried over and continued by the Protestant churches. It even has a
name: Catholicism. Although most members of Christ's body belong to
some form of this "Catholic Church," there are many who do not (like
my family). And likewise, there are many who belong to the organized
church who say they are members of Christ's body and are not - for
they have not the Spirit of Christ within them (Rom. 8:9).
The institutional church then is clearly a mixture of
believers and unbelievers, the result of trying to provide for both
saint and sinner through what is called "public worship." In spite of
the many "good" things that this religious system does (and there are
many), and the often friendly, spiritual environment it provides, it
is a Trojan horse in our midst. In the long run, it does not advance
the cause of Christ, it undermines it. It has its own agenda, and
almost always takes far more than it gives. (The same warning the
prophet Samuel gave to Israel, when they had insisted upon a king, is
true in principle for our wanting a "pastor." See 1 Samuel 8: 10-18.)
When someone is given the grace needed to believe in Jesus
Christ, that person is immediately enrolled in the only "church" they
will ever need to join - the Body of Christ. Membership in the Body
means you are automatically part of the local group of believers in
your town or city. You can enter into fellowship with them
immediately, meet wherever and whenever, and function in the gifts and
calling of your own unique calling or "ministry" as you grow in the
Lord. There is no requirement from God to join any other church or
devote your time, energy, or money to one of those other places
(unless, of course, you are specifically led into one by the Holy
Spirit for His purposes).
At the very
most, the institutional church should be considered a para-church
organization. That is, it is a peripheral church-related organization
- or ministry - on the level of say the Full Gospel Businessmen, the
700 Club, or Campus Crusade for Christ. Howard Snyder explains this
clearly in his book, The Problem of Wineskins. He writes, "Since the
Church biblically understood is always a people and can only be
people, therefore any institutional structure, whether a denomination,
a mission agency, a Christian college, an evangelical publishing
house, an evangelical association, is a para-church structure. In
other words, from the biblical standpoint, both an evangelistic
association and a denominational organization are para-church
structures, while the community of believers within these structures
are the Church (emphasis added)."
Therefore, if
you are presently attending some form of the "Catholic Church," it's
liberating to know that you don't have to continue there. As with any
para-church organization, you are free to leave at anytime. Although
many (most?) believers are quite happy with their church situation,
many are not. To these folks I say that before you pack your bags, it
is important to be fully convinced in your spirit that you can leave.
You can only gain that necessary confidence through a study of the
Scriptures. Most people have grown up under a legalistic Christianity
for so long concerning church attendance, that they would have a
guilty conscience about leaving. A troubled conscience would show that
you are not yet walking in faith in this area, and that you should
stay put until you are. "Whatever is not of faith is sin" (Rom.
14;23b).
Ironically, once we truly know we have God's permission to
leave, we are also free for the first time to stay. It is no longer a
legalistic "have to" situation, but a "God do you want me to stay
here?" situation. And sometimes He does want us to remain in a
particular church for awhile. Maybe to teach us something. Maybe to
teach somebody else something. It's His call. But stay or leave, now
we are free to follow His Spirit and not some non-existent, legalistic
commandment to belong to one of these para-church denominational
structures.
One of the
early warning signs that God is indeed trying to lead someone out, is
what I have come to call "a holy discontent" with the whole church
scene. It may begin as just boredom. Or the hassle of getting the
family ready each week and having to participate in all the scheduled
time-consuming events. Or it might result from persecution for a
scriptural truth you know the Lord has shown you. Or it might be over
a doctrine your church is teaching which you no longer consider
scripturally valid. However it starts, it leaves you discontented. You
become perplexed about exactly what you can do about it. Especially if
it's a doctrinal issue. Should you just submit to the authority of the
leadership, even though you may strongly disagree about certain
teachings or activities? That might require you pulling back though
and keeping a low profile as you feel yourself getting more critical
and judgmental of the status quo. Or should you just leave and go
somewhere else? But where? What should you do?
If you're struggling with those kinds of questions right
now, then this message could be very timely. It will help you realize
you are not crazy. That you are not the only one "feeling" this way.
Chances are, God has been trying to speak to your spirit about this
"church business" all along. But you never realized it was Him. The
truth is, He has been speaking to all His people ever since we were
taken prisoner and led captive into "the valley of the steeples." For
centuries, God has been calling His own to come out to Him outside the
camp. It is in the wilderness of the peoples that the Spirit can truly
disciple us to walk in the faith of our fathers. It is away from the
denominational names and theologies that the unity of His b2ody is
truly found. It is apart from the artificial legalism of formal
services that the true koinonia fellowship of the Holy Spirit is
experienced. "Hence, let us go out to Him outside the camp, bearing
His reproach" (Heb. 13:13).
Ox-Cart
Christianity
The
institutional church can be easily likened to the ox cart King David
used in his enthusiasm to return the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem,
which ultimately met with such disastrous results. (See 1 Chronicles
13.) The cart may have been a logical and practical solution to the
problem - but it was not the way the Word of God had instructed the
Ark to be moved. The Ark was supposed to be carried upon acacia poles,
and only by the Levite priests (1 Chron. 15: 2,13; Ex. 25). The ox
cart idea was the way the pagan Philistines had chosen to return the
Ark to Israel, and David had copied it. Sure it will carry you along
for awhile, but sooner or later you hit a bump in the road and
everything unravels. With our church system, we too copied the ways of
the Philistines. And just as the wrath of God finally stopped David's
praise-filled procession dead in it's tracks - God will surely bring
this church system to a halt, also. Not because God is a legalist, but
because He knows His ways are life, and ours are death. It's just
amazing to me that He has let us go on with this church system as long
as He has.
It's because we've adopted the world's pattern for church
organization, and not God's, that we've been so chronically weak and
powerless - and divided. Although we moan and groan about our
divisions and lack of power, we continue to march forward to Jerusalem
with our denominational ox carts in tact. Unbelievers see what a
disgrace our divisions are even more readily than we do. The only
solution is to do what David did. Stop. And go back and do it God's
way. When we adopt God's pattern, that's when the glory falls.
Therefore, if we ever want to see the glorious witness of the Church
restored, we'd better return to the Word, discover God's instructions,
and then apply them.
Is there an alternative to the institutional church? Yes,
but it's not found in replacing one religious system with another. To
paraphrase Paul's argument to the Galatians, all religious systems are
forms of law which can give no life, or impart any righteousness. If
life or righteousness could be acquired through practicing a system of
religious works, Jewish or Christian, then Jesus died for nothing. So
how can we, after having begun our life in Christ in the Spirit, be so
foolish as to think we can perfect our righteousness by conforming to
a routine of religious activities? (See Galatians, chapters 2 and 3.)
These systems, which have the appearance of godliness deal only with
the flesh and make nothing perfect (see Heb. 7:18,19).
Like Israel in the first century, we have stumbled over
the stumbling stone. We have a zeal for God, but not according to
knowledge. We need to see that we've been set free from all religious
systems to follow the spontaneous life-giving leadership of the
indwelling Holy Spirit. It is a unique, personal walk of faith and
obedience that ultimately leads to our "sanctification without which
no one will see the Lord" (Heb. 12:14). It also leads to experiencing
true, God-ordained corporate fellowship as well. Christianity is not
our savior. Jesus is!
The New Covenant pattern that we have been given is found
in the life of Jesus Himself. As He lived before God upon this earth,
laying down His self-life to walk in complete dependence upon the
Spirit, is how He wants us to live. John the Baptist said it best: "He
must increase, but I must decrease" (John 3:30). If you're looking for
something more "religious" to do than just allowing Jesus to live His
resurrected, perfected life through you by the Spirit - I'm afraid you
won't find any suggestions here. This message is about understanding
the freedom you have in Jesus, about learning how it was taken away,
and about daring to reclaim it - which will prepare you for what God
is about to do next! "Now therefore, what do I have here," declares
the Lord, "seeing that My people have been taken away without cause?
...Therefore My people shall know My name; therefore in that day I am
the one who is speaking, 'Here I am'" (Isa. 52:5,6).
We Were Institutionalized
Coming out of
the institutional church is very much like coming out of a cult.
Centuries of unscriptural practices have created a false world and a
false dependency upon the folks who manage that world. Consequently, a
certain amount of renewal of the mind through the study of the Word -
what the world would call deprogramming - is always necessary.
(Getting Sunday to "feel" like any other day of the week, for
instance, may take some time.) Generally speaking, the closer your
Christian experience has been to Roman Catholicism the more renewal
that is usually required. What you actually do for God once you are
outside institutional Christianity is between you and God. For me to
even try and tell you what to do would be to interfere with the
leading of the Spirit in your life and put you right back into the
religious-formula life I'm trying to help you escape from.
In many ways we are like the people of Russia coming out
of decades of communism. For seventy years they were a captive people
whose freedom and happiness had been involuntarily exchanged for
state-regulated security. When the gospel of communism finally proved
false, the iron curtain was miraculously ripped open and the people
released. They were now free to live their own lives and seek their
own fortunes and happiness (more or less). Suddenly, they alone were
responsible for their own success and failure. And as we've seen, it's
been a bit frightening for them. So much so that they might even
revert to the security of communism again. Didn't the Israelites yearn
to return to Egypt after they got a taste of the wilderness,
forgetting the harshness of their former slavery?
We too will face the same fears as we allow the religious
props we once depended on to fall away. But unlike the Russian nation,
we're not alone. Or on our own. He said He would never leave us or
forsake us. He sent the Holy Spirit to guide us, comfort us, teach us,
empower us, and provide for us. All He's asking us to do is believe
Him and walk by faith. And isn't that our calling? Are we not children
of Abraham? He, who "by faith...when he was called, obeyed by going
out to a place which he was to receive as an inheritance; and he went
out not knowing where he was going....he lived as an alien in the land
of promise, as in a foreign land...for he was looking for the city
which has foundations, whose architect and builder is God"
(Heb.11:8-10).
I would like
to say here also that this message is not intended to be
anti-clerical. I realize that pastors and other members of the clergy
are as much a victim of this system as any other Christian. Most have
paid a heavy price for their commitment to serve God in this manner.
Convinced that this was God's system, they were told that if they
wanted to serve Him "full-time" in response to their heartfelt,
personal call to the ministry, it was off to Bible college or
theological seminary to be ordained. Having attended one of these
"pastor factories" myself (the Lord led me to leave my career to
attend one for awhile), I have seen first-hand how systematic and
intellectual most of that preparation is. And the school I attended
was considered one of the "hottest" inter-denominational "schools of
the Spirit" of its day in the mid 70's.
No, my heart aches for the men and women who have been
saddled with keeping this man-made organization afloat in whatever
capacity they serve, while the once vibrant call in their heart grows
more moribund with each passing year. I realize that facing the truth
about the system will be even harder for these servants of the Lord,
because in most cases, they have made a lifetime commitment to it.
Their family's livelihood probably depends upon continuing in it. They
may have even gained a measure of success, which in spite of the
pressures and gnawing awareness of how much "flesh" is required to get
things done, lets them justify staying in.
If you dear
reader are a member of the clergy, I say have the courage to read what
I'm saying and do what you hear in your heart. If this message is of
God, will He not make a way for you? Will He not provide for you and
your family? Will he not bring you into your true place of calling and
ministry in the Body? For this freedom is meant for you also. And as
you begin to get free, release those who look to you for spiritual
truth. Tell them Jesus is the head of the church, not you. Tell them
to listen to the Spirit - and mean it! Tell them they belong to God -
not you. In other words, let His people go!
Hopefully, this message will also speak to those of you
who have recently awakened to the truth about Jesus but who have not
yet been contaminated with too much churchianity. It should help you
avoid some unnecessary pain and detours and speed you to a quicker
maturity in the Lord. For again, it is in the proportion that we
completely entrust our lives to the leadership of the Holy Spirit and
the Word, and depend not upon the ways of men, that we advance
spiritually in the Lord. As A.W. Tozer so aptly put it: "True religion
(or worship) is removed from diet and days, from garments and
ceremonies, and placed where it belongs, in the union of the spirit of
man with the spirit of God."
To all those who hopefully discover truth in this message
and now find themselves free enough to leave the institutional church,
I offer this word of caution from the Apostle Paul: "For you were
called to freedom, brethren; only do not turn your freedom into an
opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another" (Gal.
5:13).
The Steeple Chase
Where did
this entity known as the institutional church come from? How did it
manage to so subtly and so completely foist itself upon the Body of
Christ? The short answer is to say it was the result of a changing of
the guard. (For a more complete study, see my article, 'Voluntary
Slavery.") As the Jewish leadership passed from the scene after the
first century, the incoming Gentile administration decided to put
their own mark on how the new faith should be organized and practiced.
It was they who began to introduce worldy concepts that twisted the
words of Scripture and moved the ecclesia off the rock of God's Word
and onto the tradition of men. The faith soon became a pagan religion,
complete with holy days, a sacrificing priesthood, an organizational
hierarchy, temples of worship and a growing body of theology. Known as
"Christianity," this religion soon replaced the simple faith delivered
to us by Jesus Christ. And time did the rest. So imbedded was this
religion in our collective psyche, that not even the power of the
Protestant Reformation in the 16th century was able to completely
dislodge it. Although those godly Reformers did manage to get free of
Rome and jettison much of the false doctrine, they could not/would not
part with the organizational framework. And just as a little leaven
always leavens the whole lump, it wasn't long before the message of
the Gospel was once again corrupted by the ecclesiastical vehicle that
carried it.
But don't
think this religion of Christianity is a new religion. It is in fact
the very same "old-time religion" that has plagued mankind since the
Fall in all its manifestations. One of the best clues as to the
ancient identity of the religion was in that vision the Lord gave my
wife. The thing that symbolically unified all the churches in the
valley was the "steeple." Did you ever wonder why churches have
steeples? Historically, it could be argued, they were constructed to
house the bell that called the people to service. But why continue to
incorporate such outdated architecture today? True, steeples are very
picturesque, especially as you drive around New England. And if you're
looking for a church they make it easy to quickly locate one in town.
Nostalgia and tradition aside however, the hidden reason
churches have steeples is because it harkens back to the "mother of
churches" - the Tower of Babel. That first church, which so arrogantly
aspired to reach the heavens, was so displeasing to God that He
dramatically halted all construction on it by confusing the languages
of the church planning commission. As the people then moved on from
Babylon, they took the idolatrous tower idea with them. Ralph Woodrow,
in his book, Mystery Babylon, does a marvelous job of tracing how this
phallic symbol of sun worship reappears as the ziggurats of later
Babylon, as the obelisks of Egypt, as the minarets of Islam, as the
pagodas of oriental religions, and as the lofty spires of Christian
cathedrals.
Most church
members would be horrified if they learned that their lovely steeple
is a link to the Tower of Babel, or worse a phallic symbol.
Nevertheless, the unbroken continuation of this mysterious tradition
speaks for itself. And remember, the real horror is not the steeple.
That is but a clue that points the discerning believer to the true
identity of the religion that is served within the walls of the
building upon which the steeple sits.
But surely I
can't be saying that the many wonderful Christian worship services
that take place every Sunday in steepled churches are pagan
celebrations? Yes and no. The worship itself may be sincere and Godly
and Biblical, but the context in which it is being organized and
celebrated is none other than a Babylonian hybrid. Look at the worship
service that took place at the foot of Mount Sinai. With all
sincerity, the Israelites gathered to celebrate a "festival to the
Lord;" a thanksgiving to the god who brought them up from Egypt. They
were so sincere. It never dawned on them that they were doing
something so wrong that God would slay thousands of them for this
"idolatry" before the day was out. Sure Moses had told them not to
build a likeness of God in the image of animals, but heck, hadn't they
'worshipped God" that way for centuries in Egypt? What's the harm?
Well they found out, didn't they? The question to us is, do we want to
wait for Jesus to come back down the mountain and tell us what God
thinks of our institutional worship services? Especially when His word
already clearly instructs us in the do's and don'ts of our gathering
together? "Since you call on a Father who judges each man's work
impartially, live your lives as strangers here in reverent fear" (1
Pet. 1:17).
To Whose Voice Are We Listening?
Most
Christians, if pressed, will say they believe that membership and
regular weekly attendance at a local church is what is expected of us
by God. The purpose of this involvement is to worship God, have
fellowship with other believers and receive spiritual instruction.
Because that is what we were taught, they think all this regular
weekly activity will help keep them close to God and guard against
sliding back into the carnal ways of the world. Or as a denominational
radio commercial promoting church membership preached it, "church is
where we learn how to become better people."
In accepting this as gospel, however, a subtle but
critical transfer of power and authority has taken place. Instead of
relying upon the indwelling voice of the Holy Spirit and the Word of
God to guide us on the straight and narrow, we have switched our
dependence (and loyalty) onto someone else's voice. We have empowered
the professionals who run the local church complexes to be the keepers
of our soul. And then, having agreed to be part of this salvation
plan, we try and build our spiritual house upon a foundation of men's
traditions. A foundation that God's Word declares will not be able to
withstand the spiritual storms of life, much less bring us into our
promised inheritance.
What we further fail to realize is that in joining a local
church we're actually drawing close to the very thing we thought we
were escaping from. Namely, the carnality of the world. Long ago the
world's religious thoughts and ways became hopelessly intermingled in
the organizational life of "Christianity" and gave birth to this
hybrid church. It's no secret that "flesh" exists in the institutional
church wherever you go. Not just in the leadership or members - but in
the system itself! Yet what happens when the odor of that dead flesh
can no longer be ignored and you bring the "issue" up? Too often
you're told to relax and realize there is no perfect church. "The
Church is made up of imperfect human beings," we're told. "What can
you expect?" In other words, the Church, like everything else in the
world, is subject to the influence of the fall - so get real! The
standing joke is, even if you did find a local church that was
perfect, it would stop being perfect the minute you joined it (which
nicely takes the focus off the institution and puts it on back on you
as the problem).
But what kind of message does this attitude send? Would it
not encourage us to be lax even more about our own sins of the flesh,
saying, "Sure I'm born again, but I'm only human." Should we accept
some permanent carnality simply because we live in a world of fallen
flesh? Especially at such a foundational level as the organization of
the Church? If Martin Luther and all the Reformers had felt that way,
we'd all still be under the thumb of Rome. The Bible urges us to
always be striving by the Spirit to crucify the works of the flesh -
wherever they are found. That means not only in our individual lives
but in the corporate activity of the Church also. "So then, brethren,
we are under obligation, not to the flesh, to live according to the
flesh..." (Rom. 8:12). Whatever is of man cannot be of God. And
whatever is not of God is death. And since we have been given the Word
of God and the Spirit to show us the difference, we are really without
excuse. "For if you are living according to the flesh, you must die;
but if by the Spirit you are putting to death the deeds of the body,
you will live" (Rom. 8:13).
I suggest to you that the reason the institutional church
continually exhibits so much carnality is because it is itself carnal
to the core. It couldn't change even if it wanted to (which it
doesn't). It's a mixture of gospel truth and worldly religious
thinking that is so organically fused it can never be separated (i.e.
purified), anymore than bread that is leavened can become unleavened.
It is corrupted, and as we are instructed by the teaching revealed in
the Feast of Unleavened Bread, it should be thrown away. That was what
Jesus was implying when He likened the Kingdom of God to a woman who
had inserted leaven in the bread "until it was all leavened." Contrary
to popular teaching, this parable found in Matthew 13:33 is not
speaking of the spread of the Gospel, but of the corruption of the
Gospel. And as the parable prophesies, this leavening effect will
continue until the corruption is complete. (With the recent ordination
of homosexual ministers, I'd say we're close.)
Many excellent books have been written in recent years by
godly authors (I quoted a few at the start) zealous to see the church
restored to the biblical purity and power so briefly demonstrated in
the Book of Acts. Almost all these books point to the
institutionalization of the church as the main stumbling block. They
realize we can't turn back the clocks and be the church of the first
century, but like all of us, they want the church to recapture the
dynamic life that was so evident back then. They inevitably identify
traditional practices, teachings, and organizational concepts accepted
by the church today that weren't present in the first century. These
they correctly declare to be major obstacles to recapturing that lost
life, even tracing a number of those practices to pagan influences.
Generally, the authors suggest that if we want to get the
church back on track, then those institutional practices or teachings
must either be altered or abandoned. In effect, they try to reorganize
the organized church to get it to work. Some of the more inventive
solutions include tearing up the pews and arranging them in a circle
for better fellowship, to selling off all the church buildings and
just renting space, to ordaining all the members of the churches in
order to eliminate the clergy/laity distinction. One author, Robert
Girard, a pastor himself, didn't just theorize about it. He and his
congregation actually returned their church building to their
denomination!
All these
attempts at reform are admirable and definitely headed in the right
direction. But even if every reform they suggested was adopted, it
still wouldn't solve the problem. Why? Because the problem is the
institutional church system itself! Cutting out this or that offensive
part isn't enough. Like the dandelion in our front lawn, unless we dig
up the whole thing, root and all, it'll just keep coming back to haunt
us. But that type of radical surgery is never mentioned. Because
everyone knows it will never happen. There are too many vested
interests at stake. So if complete change is unacceptable, what is
left but for us to leave?
What Christians need to hear said now more than anything
is that they have permission from God to leave the institutional
church completely! That permission to leave must be voiced and
received if we are ever going to get back on track. But instead, if we
continue to talk of repairing the system, or working around it when it
presents an obstacle, we send a false message of hope. It says it's
basically a God-ordained institution that just has a few glitches that
we're working on. But the fact is, trying to transform the
institutional church into something fit for the Kingdom of God is the
equivalent of trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. It will
always be a sow's ear, fit only for dogs to chew on.
A Christmas Story
One of the
first things that helped my wife and I see that the church system is
unredeemable was in our attempts to celebrate Christmas correctly.
After we were born again, we became more and more sensitized to the
unscriptural tradition surrounding Christmas. We could see, for
example, that Christmas was really centered more around the tree and
gift-giving than around Jesus. Researching the "tree" I found its
roots actually went back to pagan antiquity. It seems the "ever-green"
tree was a symbol of eternal life (a substitute for Jesus) that had
even ensnared the Northern Kingdom of Israel when she "worshipped
under every green tree" (2 Kings 17:10). In an attempt, therefore, to
"do it right" and restore the focus to Jesus, we tried to turn the
traditional celebration into a "Happy Birthday Jesus" party. You see
we still thought that Christmas was a legitimate Christian celebration
of the birth of Jesus that had just become somewhat paganized and
secularized over the centuries.
What we finally realized was that Christmas was actually a
pagan holy day of sun worship commemorating the birth of Zeus/Jupiter,
which had been Christianized over the centuries! (Jesus was probably
born around the Feast of Tabernacles in October.) That changed
everything about how we viewed and celebrated Christmas from then on.
As with
Christmas, we eventually came to see that the entire institutional
church system was nothing more than an amalgamation of the world's
religious ideas with a Christian veneer. It was a conclusion we didn't
arrive at quickly or lightly, but with great emotional turmoil and
crying out to God. Not that I believe we are unique in either seeing
or struggling with this disturbing situation. I'm convinced that every
serious Christian from the second century on has wrestled with this
very same issue to some degree. The Holy Spirit wouldn't be doing His
job if we weren't. (And you thought the reason it was always so
difficult to get the family off to church on Sunday morning was
because the devil was hindering you. Did you ever consider that it
might be God?)
This is a hard concept to accept, I know. Look at the
agony of soul that Martin Luther went through as he began to
comprehend that the Roman Catholic church was not the official
representative of Jesus on earth as it had declared itself to be. (It
got even harder when he saw it represented the very antithesis of the
Kingdom of God.) When he finally posted his 95 theses on the church
gate at Wittenberg Castle, he was angrily denounced and persecuted by
the leadership of the entire secular and religious world of his day.
The words of one religious official at Rome, by the name of Alexander,
were typical: "Has the Catholic Church been dead for a thousand years
to be revived only by Martin? Has the whole world gone wrong and
Martin only has the eyes to see?"
The fact that the Bible agreed with most of Luther's
arguments, as did millions of believers, gives evidence to the
legitimacy of the debate. It was just unfortunate that once the
believing church acquired a number of reforms it settled down again
within the system, and the public side of the debate ceased. But the
internal debate has never ceased. The Holy Spirit won't allow it to
cease. Which is why my wife and I, and so many others believers today,
have had to struggle with the whole issue, over and over again.
What made it so emotionally exhausting for us was simply
our own unbelief. The Lord had been plainly showing us the truth about
the institutional church from the start. We just couldn't accept it.
Awakening to the reality of Jesus after a lifetime of membership in
Roman Catholicism had already shown us that at least one major
denomination hadn't been telling us the truth. But it's one thing to
see it in your own church, and another to believe it's true for the
whole church system. But that was followed by the vision Mo had of
Jesus on the hillside, constant revelations in the Word, a study of
church history, and our own subsequent church experiences. Still, it
was like being told that someone you have long respected is actually a
fraud and a cheat. At first you deny it. Then as the evidence mounts,
you become more and more suspect, going back and forth between
agreeing with the evidence and shying away from the conclusion it
undeniably points to.
Part of the
difficulty we realized is that the institutional church is a master at
adapting itself to changing times. It's always working hard to
brighten its image and make its programs contemporary and attractive.
Just when you think you see it for what it is, it changes
chameleon-like into something new and seemingly more relevant. And
then you're not so sure anymore.
One reason we were continually fooled was because we were
always looking at the wrong thing. It's like the story of the man in a
foreign country who would ride his bicycle to the border every week
and want to cross. Although the border guard was convinced the man was
a smuggler, he could never find any contraband on the man or in his
basket of goods, and would have to let him pass. This went on for
years. After the guard retired, he spotted the man in the street one
day and asked him to please tell him what he'd been smuggling. No
longer concerned about being arrested, the man obliged. "Bicycles," he
said with a smile.
As long as we keep thinking that "what's wrong" with the
church is the pastor, the building, the ritual, the teaching, the
denomination, etc. - we'll look right past the real problem:
questioning the very legitimacy of the institutional church itself. As
the oft quoted Marshall McLuhan has said, "The medium is the message."
It's the vehicle carrying the message that often speaks louder than
the message itself. That explains why so often we would hear a
powerful teaching of truth preached from some church pulpit and think,
"gee - at least this part must be of God." Before we knew it, we were
giving the system another chance.
When we finally sorted it all out and stopped doubting, we
came to two bottom-line conclusions. First, Jesus is definitely not
the head of the institutional church. Second, as a system of
organization for the Body of Christ, it is completely dysfunctional.
The Wrong Head
I was
visiting the Museum of Natural History in New York City with my family
and we found ourselves in the dinosaur exhibit. A tour was being given
and the guide was pointing to a massive dinosaur skeleton towering
above us. After describing the beast, whose name I've forgotten, the
guide mentioned that the skull we were looking at was not the real
head. Pointing over to a glass cabinet behind us that contained
another skull, she said that was the real head. The mistake had been
realized years before, but the curator felt the skeleton was too
fragile to attempt putting the right head back on the dinosaur.
In a flash, I realized the Spirit was telling me that this
was the same situation in the institutional church. It has man as its
head - not Jesus Christ. And because this structure is so unstable,
any attempt to reintroduce the true head of the Church to this body
will cause the whole thing to collapse (which is what happens during a
revival). Better to preserve the dry bones in their present
theological configuration, the thinking goes, than risk a total
collapse.
This hierarchy of control found in the institutional
church hardly lines up with the order of leadership spoken of in
Scripture. For example, the pastors (shepherds) that Jesus gave to the
Church were for the whole Body of Christ. They may in fact only
minister to a limited number of believers, but they were to be
available to the whole Body. "Now to each one the manifestation of the
Spirit (for ministry) is given for the common good"(1Cor. 12:7). No
ministry was just for the exclusive benefit of one group of Christians
as you see happening in every institutional church. Visit one and you
will hear, "Have you met our pastor, yet?" Paul chastised the
Corinthian believers who were following after favorite preachers. "For
when one says, 'I follow Paul,' and another says, 'I follow Apollos,'
are you not (acting) as mere men?" (1 Cor. 1:4).
Under the New Covenant, all authority and leadership
belongs to Jesus. And as it was exercised through His Body, that
authority was to be based on mutual submission in love to one another.
"The kings of the gentiles lord it over one another... You are not to
be like them. The greatest among you should be like the youngest, and
the one who rules like the one who serves." If you want to be first in
the Kingdom of God," he said, "be the least" (Luke 22:24-26).
All of this religious leadership with titles and a
hierarchy of authority is classic Gentile religion. But Christianity
was not supposed to be a religion. The remnant of Jacob who were
chosen to follow Jesus and preserve the continuation of Israel were
not being asked to trade in their perfectly good God-given religion
for a better one. In trading in their Mosaic religion they were
exchanging all religion for an intimate relationship with God through
Jesus. They had been set free from scripted religious activity to
serve Him in the newness of the Spirit. "It was for freedom that
Messiah set us free, so keep standing firm and do not be subject again
to a yoke of slavery" (Gal. 5:1).
Even though most born-again Christians today would agree
that Christianity is not a religion, we seem unable to grasp the
simplicity of the concept that 'no religion' means "NO RELIGION!"
We've been in the habit of attending church for so long - even before
we were Christians - that the thought of not belonging to one is
considered to be merely the habit of atheists and backsliders.
Contrast that attitude with the situation of Christianity under the
Roman Empire, as Sir Robert Anderson, a 19th century English Bible
teacher, reports it in his book, Types in Hebrews. "In those days, the
State required that all Roman subjects should profess some religion,
but the Christians who had neither altars nor priests, neither
sacrifices nor images, were held to have no religion at all... and so
they were looked on as atheists and punished accordingly, and even by
such enlightened rulers as Trajan and Marcus Aurelius."
The simple message of "Christ in me, the hope of glory,"
has been almost lost over the centuries. I was reminded of that again
when at another time I entered our local Y.M.C.A. to inquire about
their sports programs. I was shocked to be confronted with a picture
of Jesus Christ behind the main desk. Suddenly I remembered that in
spite of the totally secular pursuits of the Y today, this whole
institution was once the Young Men's Christian Association. But the
original focus having long been forgotten (and the Spirit long
departed), like any business, they had simply hung a picture of the
founder in the lobby. The institutional church isn't quite the
entertainment center the Y is yet, but lest anyone forget who the
Founder was, His name is referred to at almost every service.
We've deceived ourselves into thinking the institutional
church is God's pearl that has simply become encrusted with man's
religion over the years - that if we just chip away at the crust we
can redeem the pearl. When you honestly measure this church against
Scripture, you see it cannot be from God no matter how much crust you
remove. It's so permeated with flesh that it clearly reveals itself a
byproduct of man's reasoning. That's why all our efforts to revitalize
the institutional church have failed. And will continue to fail.
Christianity is Christ. No simpler, plainer definition was ever
stated. He is all there is. The Church is not a bunch of individual
people bound together in an organization. It's a bunch of individual
people who now all share the same life of Christ within. Anderson
again clearly discerned the difference when he wrote: "In Christianity
the Lord Jesus Christ is all and in all. But in this system (the
organized church) Christ is an institution to be administered by the
Church...Christ as a person is forgotten. The fundamental questions of
salvation are not answered by reference to Him....;' Ministers of
Christ are the Church's ministry: the Lord's Supper is her sacrament:
and even the Divine Scriptures which speak of Him are her Scriptures,
bracketed with her creed as being of equal authority and value."
The Spirit Voted Out
It seems we
have made the same tragic mistake ancient Israel did when she refused
to heed the Voice of God through His official spokespersons, the
prophets. They even murdered some of them rather than change their
idolatrous ways. In the same way, the Church of Jesus Christ turned a
deaf ear to the Holy Spirit early on, in effect banning Him from
having any direct say in Church management. Which explains why, as
pastor A.W. Tozer observed, "It is now possible for the youngest
pastor just out of seminary to have more actual authority in a church
than Jesus Christ has." And, "among the gospel churches Christ is now
in fact little more than a beloved symbol."
In His place a government of men was set up, which became
known as "the one, holy, catholic, apostolic church." Or the Catholic
Church for short. Catholic, which means "universal," is the right name
for it because it represents an ecclectic mixture of all the religious
thought of man from around the world and across the centuries. One
Roman Catholic writer, in a burst of zeal, declared that "Christianity
is not a contradiction of paganism, but a cap for it." He saw the
pagan thinking of previous ages as a foreshadowing of the "truth" as
it was now embodied in "Christianity." And as it relates to organized
Christianity he was right! It was an understanding that was championed
by no less a light than Cardinal John Henry Newman, who held that the
pagan writers and Greek philosophers were as God's prophets to the
Gentile world before Christ. Is it any wonder that the Church is so
confused, when the very darkness Jesus came to dispel was "sanctified"
and brought into the sanctuary?
In time, the monolithic Catholic Church split apart into
different national/cultural expressions, paralleling the breakup of
the Roman Empire to which it had become so intimately wed. First it
separated into the Western Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox
churches, and then again into the various Protestant sects. But
although divided, it was still all the same Catholic Church.
Attempting to put it back together again won't turn it into something
it never was - i.e. Christ's Body. It will only become what it always
was: the evil fruit of men's religious reasoning. And to the degree we
continue to advance it as part of the life of the Church we will reap
corruption.
Ultimately,
this religious system undermines the faith and maturity of the
individual believer. Instead of helping us to grow in Christ, it
actually keeps us as babes, dependent upon it for nourishment and
guidance. And then pastors wonder why so few members ever reach
maturity in Christ. We are just like the Galatians, who having turned
back to religion, caused Paul to lament, "My children, with whom I am
again in labor until Christ is formed in you!" (Gal. 4:19). Minus the
Spirit's ministry and leadership, the institutional church system is
but "a form of religion denying the power thereof." It simply is
powerless to help us grow.
You might think that because the Scriptures are read or
taught in most churches that God's Word would surely have an effect on
the human spirit. But too often it falls on deaf ears and remains
unfruitful. I once thought that wasn't possible because Scripture
declares, "My word shall not return unto me void" (Isa. 55: 11). But I
realized Scripture also declares that our traditions do "make void the
word of God" (see Mark 7:1-9;6-13). In the parable of the sower, Jesus
also taught that the Word can be unproductive due to several causes
(see Matthew 13 :18-23). Religious tradition, which kills the seed
before it can work its way into the heart, would qualify as the seed
in the parable that fell along the path that the birds (the evil one)
devoured. (see v.4,19). The longer a church exists, the stronger its
tradition, and the faster the Word is devoured.
There's another reason the Word of God rarely penetrates
the hearts of those sitting in the pews each Sunday. By and large, the
people are not there of their own free will. They come because they
think God requires them to be there. They are living, not under grace,
but under law. This also will crush the life out of the Word. To quote
author Robert Girard, "The law, neither the Old Testament law, nor the
principle of seeking to please God by conforming to an outward set of
rules, could ever produce life. The inevitable result of laying the
law upon the flesh, trying to make human nature conform (even in a
Christian) is always death. Frustration. Failure."
If only we'd see that the institutional church is not a
heavenly blessing, but an earthly corruption. Then we could return to
living in the reality that the Bible describes the church. To quote
author John Havilik, "The church is never a place, but always a
people; never a fold but always a flock; never a sacred building but
always a believing assembly. The church is you who pray, not where you
pray. A structure of brick or marble can no more be a church than your
clothes of serge or satin can be you."
There's a question that has been asked before, but which
bears repeating because it really helps put everything into
perspective. The question is: "If the Apostle Paul were alive today,
and wrote a letter to the church in your city, who would get the
letter?"
Think about that for a minute. No doubt several area
bishops would quickly claim to be the mailing address of the church in
your area. But they'd be ignoring all those believers, like you
perhaps, who don't belong to their church. Where then is the church
found? As I quoted Tozer earlier, "The church is found wherever the
Holy Spirit has drawn together a few persons who trust Christ for
their salvation, worship God in spirit and truth, and have no dealings
with the flesh and devil." I would just add this qualification. We
don't stop being the church just because we're apart from other
believers. Alone or gathered together with other believers, we're
still the church. If I was the only believer in town, then I alone
would be the church (and entitled to receive the letter).
The Lord Is The Spirit. And Vice Versa
The one,
indispensable factor in our individual growth, ministry and fellowship
- is the Holy Spirit. He not only represents the Lord, He is the Lord.
"Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is there
is liberty" (2 Cor. 3:17). He is everything. He is Jesus. Where His
rule and Presence are acknowledged and obeyed the church thrives.
Where His rule and Presence are denied, the power of the church is
short circuited and the institutional church arises. Freedom
collapses. Death is introduced. In that type of environment, the only
time life can spring forth is when the Holy Spirit chooses to invade
the place with resurrection power - either sovereignly or through
certain individuals filled with the Spirit. Which means that whenever
life does happen in a church it is not because of the system - but in
spite of it!
This realization puts an entirely different slant also on
how we view the Holy Spirit revivals we've experienced down through
history. Instead of seeing them as means to renew and purify the
organized church as we may have thought, Jesus has been actually
trying to awaken His people to set us free from those enclaves. (As
well as birthing a new generation of souls into the Kingdom who had
trouble finding the Door due to the church's preoccupation with
religion.) But for the most part, we have been ignoring His voice
calling us to "come out."
I have no doubt that this was the reason Jesus was weeping
so in my wife's vision. He was expressing the same depth of sorrow
over His people as He did nearly two thousand years ago when He cried
out, "O Jerusalem, O Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones
those who are sent to her. How often I wanted to gather your children
together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you
were unwilling!" (Matt. 23: 37). Like Jewish Israel, we too have
obstinately resisted His will and frustrated His heart's desire to
shower us with the fullness of His love. And like them, we have paid
an awful price for that stubborn rebellion. For the judgment Jesus
pronounced, I believe, fell also on us: "Behold, your house is left to
you desolate" (v. 38). In other words, the awesome presence of God in
our corporate midst was removed with the introduction of institutional
Christianity. And every time a free, spirit-filled people who have
gathered together return to that form of government, the light begins
to fade. We are then on our own. But thank God He doesn't leave us
there. As He promised full restoration to the Jews one day (Rom.
11:15,26,27), he does the same with us. We just need to meet this one
condition: "For I tell you, you shall not see me again, until you say,
- 'Baruch haba hashem Adonai - blessed is He who comes in the name of
the Lord'" (v.39).
Delegated Authority
At the heart
of the matter is the issue of "delegated authority." That is, will we
receive the one whom God has chosen to represent Him - the one who
comes in His name - or not? It was to this principle of delegated
authority that Israel agreed after arriving at Mt. Sinai and hearing
the Voice of God directly. Accompanied by fire and earthquake as it
was, they found the Voice so terrifying and awesome, that they cried
out in terror to Moses, "Speak to us yourself and we will listen; but
let not God speak to us, lest we die" (Ex 20:19). From then on God
would only speak to them through a chosen intermediary. That meant, in
order for them to "hear" His voice (i.e. discern that it came from
God) they would have to exercise some faith. Scripture tells us that
God was well pleased with their decision, saying to Moses, "They have
spoken well" (Deut. 18:17).
So Moses became the first to officially come to them "in
His Name." He was then followed by a long line of prophets. But Israel
quickly ignored or rejected these men (even Moses) with their
"annoying" messages from God. The consequences were that they suffered
continual wars, and even exile from their homeland.
After the people returned from Babylon and became
re-established as a nation, a period of 400 years ensued when no
prophet was in the land speaking for God. Then one day, in fulfillment
of the words of Isaiah, the Voice was heard again - "the voice of one
crying in the wilderness," saying, "make ready the way of the Lord,
make His paths straight" (Matt. 3:3). John the Baptist, dressed in the
garb of the old prophets, proclaimed the coming of the Kingdom of God.
But He too was rejected and killed. Beheaded. But not before giving
witness to the ministry "of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of
the world." In Jesus, God had now sent to them His only Son. But He
fared no better than all the rest of God's servant intermediaries
(even if it was according to God's plan). Allying themselves with the
Gentiles, the religious leaders quickly had Him crucified.
However, after Jesus arose and returned to heaven, God did
not become silent again. To those who'd believed in Jesus and received
Him He sent the Holy Spirit. It was the Spirit who had now come in the
"name of the Lord." - just as Jesus had foretold. "But the Helper, the
Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you
all things" (John 14:26).
Therefore, as far as we are concerned, the Holy Spirit is
God's only delegated authority speaking to the Church in this present
age. Preachers may preach, and teachers may teach, but it's the
Spirit's Voice that God is still speaking through to His people. And
it's only His Voice that we should be listening to. Now if Israel
received such severe punishment for rejecting God's delegated
authorities who came in the flesh, how much more accountable are we?
"See to it that you do not refuse Him who is speaking. For if those
did not escape when they refused Him who warned them on earth, much
less shall we escape who turn away from Him who warns from heaven"
(Heb. 12: 25).
By ignorantly choosing to empower the institutional
church, we rejected the authority of the Holy Spirit. Consequently
"our house" was also left to us "desolate." As Jesus said in the
vision given to my wife, "I'm not in there!" Therefore, while there is
still time, we must repent and acknowledge that the Spirit alone is
appointed to lead the Church. When we say of Him, "Blessed is He who
comes in the name of the Lord," then will He return to His House - His
holy temple made without hands. And the world will then see a Church
that gives glory and honor to the Lord. Even the Jewish people will
say of us, "Blessed are you who come in the name of the Lord" - and
their eyes too will be opened to see Jesus. And as Scripture tells us,
the result of the Jews finally seeing their Messiah will be "life from
the dead" for the whole world (Rom. 11:15).
Regarding this repentance from institutional Christianity,
A.W. Tozer came to virtually the same conclusion after admitting that
he himself, as a member of the church hierarchy, was "very much
involved in the situation I here deplore." He concluded there was only
one real course of direction for the Church. We should "...go down in
meek humility and confess that we have grieved the Spirit and
dishonored the Lord in failing to give Him the place His Father has
given Him as head and Lord of the Church."
Likewise, W.T.P. Wolston, in his book, The Church: What
is it?, writes, "The greatest sin of Christendom is the way the
Holy Ghost has been treated in what calls itself the Church." Now if
our repentance is sincere, then it ought to be accompanied by a change
in our behavior. We can't just go back to business as usual. Since
this situation has been going on for centuries, we know that our time
is running out.
Christ and Anti-Christ
I saved this
insight till last. I figure anyone still reading must be getting some
kind of blessing out of my message and can probably handle what I am
about to say. I have already argued strongly that the institutional
church and the Body of Christ are two different entities. Two
different bodies. The question I now ask you to consider is, if the
true ecclesia is the Body of Christ, whose body is that other group a
part of? Especially when you realize that the institutional church
claims to be the Body of Christ, but it is not? Who else but the body
of the false Christ, the false Messiah - the one called Anti-Christ?
Is it any wonder that the command is given in Revelation 18:4: "Come
out of her my people. Lest you partake of her sins and receive of her
plagues."
I believe we will see the institutional church finally
possessed by the Spirit of Satan. He will come to his house and occupy
it. Somehow he will unify the denominations, both Catholic and
Protestant, and then they will go forth with great miracle-working
power to deceive the world. On the surface this "Christian" entity
will appear to be the true body of Christ. Today I see congregation
after congregation sincerely praying and fasting and believing for a
new revival. But the next revival may not be from the Holy Spirit. It
could come from the Spirit of the institutional church they continue
to believe in. Hopefully, all those true believers still in there who
have been ignoring all the prompting of the Holy Spirit up to now will
wake up and read the handwriting on the wall - and get out! If not, it
will be too late for them. They will have made their choice to be a
part of that body, and sadly "they will receive of her plagues." Dame
Babylon will then be revealed!
Final Call
I believe
that we are hearing the Holy Spirit's final call these days to put
aside childish things and separate from our devotion to playing
"Christianity." It reminds me of when I was a boy and my mother would
call me from the third-floor window of our apartment building on Long
Island to stop playing and come in for dinner. I usually would yell
up, "Just five more minutes, Ma, we're almost finished." This would
happen several times, and then would come the final call that let me
know that if I didn't come now, I might not see dinner. Or worse. That
is the "call" I hear the Lord saying now.
For those who won't "come in," they too could miss
"dinner." Or worse. In the parable of the ten virgins, we read, "At
midnight the cry rang out, 'Come out to meet Him!'" And the five
foolish virgins who weren't ready suddenly had to go off in search of
oil (those who hadn't yet learned how to be self-sufficient in the
supply of God's power, but were still dependent upon the professionals
- "the dealers" - to kindle their faith). "But those who were ready
went in with him to the wedding feast; and the door was shut" (see
Matt. 25: 1-10).
Readiness is the key. Over and over the Lord warns us
through the Scriptures to keep alert; to stay on our spiritual
tip-toes, "for you do not know which day your Lord is coming" (Matt.
24:42). In conjunction with His coming there will no doubt be required
of us a large leap of faith. Therefore we should be ready to move in
faith at all times. We don't want to turn back in unbelief as Lot's
wife did and become a pile of useless salt. We want to be as primed as
the Hebrews were on the night of the tenth plague in Egypt. They had
been told to eat the Passover lamb, "with your loins covered, your
sandals on your feet, and your staff in your hand" (Ex. 12:11). They
were ready to leave on a moment's notice to enter into their
inheritance. The command to us is the same: "Be dressed in readiness,
and keep your lamps alight" (Luke 12:35).
It is my prayer and hope that this generation will finally
see the church system for what it is - a counterfeit, a false body of
Christ. May all who are His be given the grace to finally separate
from it completely, as the Lord leads, in preparation for our being
truly gathered together unto Him. I believe we're living in the time
of the fulfillment of all that the prophets spoke concerning the
regathering of the whole House of Israel - a corporate term that
includes the Jewish people who are at long last awakening to their
Messiah, and those Gentiles who have been circumcised of heart with
the covenant circumcision of God.
"Therefore behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord,
when they will no longer say, 'As the Lord lives who brought up the
people of Israel out of the land of Egypt,' but, 'As the Lord lives,
who brought up and led back the descendants of the household of Israel
out from the north land and from all the countries where I had driven
them.' Then they will live on their own soil" (Jer. 23:7,8).
The Lord's gathering of us together, "as a hen gathers her
chicks under her wings," could come at any time. But will we hear the
call? And if we hear it, will we have faith to obey? It depends on
whose voice we call "master." For Jesus said, "No one can serve two
masters" (Matt .6:24). Are we so submitted to the voice of Mother
church that we will not recognize the voice of our Father when He
calls? Are we so conditioned to listen to official pronouncements from
the altar concerning the activities of God, that the small still voice
on the inside of us can't be trusted?
We must decide which church body we want to belong to, and
whose voice we are going to follow. We can't serve two masters. And
the time to make that decision is upon us.
"And now, brethren, I know that you acted in ignorance,
just as your rulers did also....Repent therefore and return, that your
sins may be wiped away, in order that times of refreshing may come
from the presence of the Lord; and that He may send Jesus, the Christ
appointed for you , whom heaven must receive until the period of
restoration of all things about which God spoke by the mouth of His
holy prophets from ancient time" (Acts 3:17, 19-21).
2003
|